Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Christopher Frew

Christopher Frew

Christopher Frew is a Pass-Catching Back for Air Force. Christopher's 2025 season ranks in the 65th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 69 plays — a average rate for the RB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

12%
projected
band 4%'25 8%19%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
285 Rush yards2 Rush TD57 Carries5.0 Yards/carry
Receiving
7 Receptions52 Rec yards0 Rec TD7.4 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns24 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)65th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency64th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.15 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.31 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Hawai'i (SP+ 2).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Bucknell: +0.93 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs Utah State: +0.16 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Boise State: -0.05 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Hawai'i: +1.31 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Navy: -0.15 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs UNLV: +1.16 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Wyoming: +0.28 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Army: +0.30 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs San José State: +1.16 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs UConn: +0.36 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs New Mexico: -0.56 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Colorado State: +0.90 EPA/play14
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsBucknellW49-1355210.400.93
3@Utah StateL30-49-3.1188.001300.16
4vsBoise StateL37-493.14133.301-10-0.05
5vsHawai'iL35-441.73289.311401.31
6@NavyL31-346.27101.40180-0.15
7@UNLVL48-514.35367.2011501.16
8vsWyomingW24-21-11.313493.8111000.28
10vsArmyL17-200.82-6-3.0011300.30
11@San José StateW26-16-14.33268.701.16
12@UConnL16-265.17385.400.36
13vsNew MexicoL3-200.95122.40-0.56
14@Colorado StateW42-21-15.62199.500.90

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
8.4%
Passing plays
6.4%
Rushing plays
9.0%
Standard downs
7.5%
Passing downs
11.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.24
Passing downs
0.68
Pass / Rush EPA
0.59 / 0.34

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.