Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Conner Weigman

#1Conner Weigman

Conner Weigman is a Dual-Threat QB for Houston. Conner's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 460 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

44%
projected
band 26%'25 53%62%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing
232/356 Comp/Att2705 Pass yards25 Pass TD9 INT65.2% Comp %
Rushing
703 Rush yards11 Rush TD170 Carries4.1 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency79th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.69 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Arizona (SP+ 12).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Stephen F. Austin: +0.34 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Rice: +0.22 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Colorado: +0.41 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Oregon State: +0.14 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Texas Tech: +0.03 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Oklahoma State: +0.44 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Arizona: +0.69 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs West Virginia: +0.34 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs UCF: -0.01 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs TCU: +0.10 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Baylor: +0.24 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs LSU: +0.40 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsStephen F. AustinW27-015/241593074.73900.34
2@RiceW35-9-14.815/221881056.72310.22
3vsColoradoW36-20-8.315/242220075.78320.41
5@Oregon StateW27-24-15.920/362702139.7-110.14
6vsTexas TechL11-3527.65/12710127.0700.03
7@Oklahoma StateW39-17-15.121/303062072.2-310.44
8vsArizonaW31-2812.015/231643094.59810.69
9@Arizona StateW24-163.917/222011086.51112
10vsWest VirginiaL35-45-6.825/353094244.0-2710.34
11@UCFW30-27-1.220/312232346.4820-0.01
13vsTCUL14-178.315/291612146.311400.10
14@BaylorW31-241.421/312011175.912120.24
1vsLSUW38-3510.328/372304092.85600.40

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
52.5%
Passing plays
89.0%
Rushing plays
26.2%
Standard downs
48.5%
Passing downs
61.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.24
Passing downs
0.38
Pass / Rush EPA
0.33 / 0.21

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.