Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Damon Bankston

#1Damon Bankston

Damon Bankston is a Pass-Catching Back for New Mexico. Damon's 2025 season ranks in the 48th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 121 plays — a average rate for the RB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

16%
projected
band 9%'25 17%24%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
635 Rush yards5 Rush TD114 Carries5.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
31 Receptions397 Rec yards3 Rec TD12.8 Yards/rec
Returns
12 Kick returns434 KR yards2 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)48th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency73th %ile · average
Key findings
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.77 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs UNLV (SP+ 4).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson20192130.4704.7100.1
Saquon BarkleyPenn State20162880.3403.997.9
Clyde Edwards-HelaireLSU20192160.4905.0105.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Michigan: +0.14 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Idaho State: +0.44 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs UCLA: +0.60 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs New Mexico State: -0.10 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs San José State: +0.56 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Boise State: +0.28 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Nevada: +0.04 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs UNLV: +0.77 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Colorado State: +0.27 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Air Force: +0.19 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs San Diego State: +0.00 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Minnesota: +0.14 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@MichiganL17-3412.44184.5042100.14
2vsIdaho StateW32-226284.7115500.44
3@UCLAW35-10-8.71515410.3134910.60
5vsNew Mexico StateW38-20-15.59384.20280-0.10
6@San José StateL28-35-14.39515.7121500.56
7@Boise StateL25-413.19182.0025200.28
8vsNevadaW24-22-13.46193.200.04
9vsUtah StateW33-14-3.113846.51110
10@UNLVW40-354.3482.00512220.77
12vsColorado StateW20-17-15.69434.8021600.27
13@Air ForceW20-3-3.210616.1132700.19
14vsSan Diego StateW23-176.710565.601800.00
1vsMinnesotaL17-201.510575.7052300.14

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
16.9%
Passing plays
9.3%
Rushing plays
24.5%
Standard downs
17.7%
Passing downs
15.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.17
Passing downs
0.71
Pass / Rush EPA
0.84 / 0.14

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.