Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Daniel Hishaw Jr.

#9Daniel Hishaw Jr.

Daniel Hishaw Jr. is a Committee Back for Kansas. Daniel's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 108 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

17%
projected
band 10%'25 19%25%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
587 Rush yards5 Rush TD124 Carries4.7 Yards/carry
Receiving
6 Receptions33 Rec yards0 Rec TD5.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.18 from the first to second half of the season.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Fresno State: -0.07 EPA/play1Wk 1 vs Wagner: -0.07 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Missouri: -0.46 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs West Virginia: -0.05 EPA/play4Wk 7 vs Texas Tech: +0.20 EPA/play7Wk 10 vs Oklahoma State: +0.04 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Arizona: -0.03 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Iowa State: +0.24 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Utah: +0.11 EPA/play14
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsFresno StateW31-71.813695.30150-0.07
1vsWagnerW46-714896.41-0.07
2@MissouriL31-4214.46111.801-20-0.46
4vsWest VirginiaW41-10-6.8294.50-0.05
7@Texas TechL17-4227.68536.600.20
9vsKansas StateL17-427.019673.513280
10vsOklahoma StateW38-21-15.114654.620.04
11@ArizonaL20-2412.018673.70120-0.03
13@Iowa StateL14-389.98506.300.24
14vsUtahL21-3122.2221074.910.11

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
18.5%
Passing plays
1.5%
Rushing plays
33.0%
Standard downs
20.9%
Passing downs
11.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.10
Passing downs
0.19
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.47 / 0.14

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.