#10Danny Scudero

WR·San José State·2025

Danny Scudero is a Versatile WR for San José State. Danny's 2025 season ranks in the 63th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 149 plays — a average rate for the WR.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

13%

projected

band 10%'25 19%17%

Regressed toward the WR mean. Model correlation r≈0.47 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Receiving

88 Receptions1297 Rec yards10 Rec TD14.7 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

Player type

Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)63th %ile · average

Game-to-game consistency64th %ile · average

Key findings

▸6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.41 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 0.84 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Central Michigan (SP+ -9).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

Player	Team	Yr	Plays	WEPA/play	Line val	Total EPA
Shai Werts	Georgia Southern	2020	128	0.310	1.0	39.7
Jerrod Heard	Texas	2015	116	0.290	1.6	33.6
D.J. Foster	Arizona State	2014	174	0.200	1.0	34.8
Malik Dunner	Ball State	2017	76	0.290	0.4	22.0
Davis Bryson	Kennesaw State	2024	97	0.200	0.0	19.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
1	vsCentral Michigan	L14-16	-8.8	9	189	21.0	1	46	0.84
2	@Texas	L7-38	16.2	7	66	9.4	0	21	-0.10
4	vsIdaho	W31-28	—	6	130	21.7	0	56	0.49
5	@Stanford	L29-30	-11.8	11	135	12.3	2	43	0.60
6	vsNew Mexico	W35-28	0.9	7	151	21.6	1	70	0.83
7	@Wyoming	L28-35	-11.3	10	180	18.0	4	72	0.45
8	@Utah State	L25-30	-3.1	6	25	4.2	0	9	-0.30
10	vsHawai'i	W45-38	1.7	7	215	30.7	2	62	0.71
11	vsAir Force	L16-26	-3.2	5	41	8.2	0	13	0.08
12	@Nevada	L10-55	-13.4	4	29	7.3	0	11	0.21
13	@San Diego State	L3-25	6.7	12	79	6.6	0	17	0.03
14	vsFresno State	L14-41	1.8	4	57	14.3	0	36	-0.10

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

19.2%

Passing plays

32.1%

Rushing plays

0.0%

Standard downs

17.8%

Passing downs

22.1%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.24
Passing downs: 0.42
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.31 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).