#2Demond Williams Jr.

QB·Washington·2025

Demond Williams Jr. is a Dual-Threat QB for Washington. Demond's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 401 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

46%

projected

band 28%'25 56%64%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing

246/354 Comp/Att3065 Pass yards25 Pass TD8 INT69.5% Comp %

Rushing

612 Rush yards6 Rush TD143 Carries4.3 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

Player type

Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency68th %ile · average

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
▸4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.34 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 1.16 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Washington State (SP+ 4).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	C/ATT	Pass Yds	Pass TD	INT	QBR	Rush Yds	Rush TD	EPA/play
1	vsColorado State	W38-21	-15.6	18/24	226	1	0	69.7	68	0	0.32
2	vsUC Davis	W70-10	—	16/25	254	1	0	93.1	64	1	0.70
4	@Washington State	W59-24	3.8	16/19	298	4	0	99.3	88	1	1.16
5	vsOhio State	L6-24	30.1	18/22	173	0	0	49.2	-28	0	0.03
6	@Maryland	W24-20	0.6	28/41	275	2	1	74.0	54	0	0.29
7	vsRutgers	W38-19	1.0	21/27	402	2	0	92.4	136	2	0.79
8	@Michigan	L7-24	12.4	20/32	209	0	3	45.0	-19	0	0.10
9	vsIllinois	W42-25	12.9	26/33	280	4	0	90.5	66	0	—
11	@Wisconsin	L10-13	-4.4	20/32	134	1	1	45.2	61	0	0.04
12	vsPurdue	W49-13	-6.1	16/19	257	2	0	86.1	23	0	0.79
13	@UCLA	W48-14	-8.7	17/26	213	2	1	53.7	56	2	0.07
14	vsOregon	L14-26	25.9	15/30	129	2	2	59.9	27	0	-0.20
1	vsBoise State	W38-10	3.1	15/24	215	4	0	84.5	16	0	0.33

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

56.5%

Passing plays

93.2%

Rushing plays

24.6%

Standard downs

50.7%

Passing downs

71.4%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.23
Passing downs: 0.49
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.30 / 0.47

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).