Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Dequan Finn

#1Dequan Finn

Dequan Finn is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Miami (OH). Dequan's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 222 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

42%
projected
band 24%'25 48%60%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing
106/181 Comp/Att1451 Pass yards9 Pass TD6 INT58.6% Comp %
Rushing
395 Rush yards4 Rush TD89 Carries4.4 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency60th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.65 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 2.21 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Western Michigan (SP+ -1).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Wisconsin: -0.03 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Rutgers: +0.45 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs UNLV: +0.07 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Northern Illinois: +0.25 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Akron: +0.45 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Eastern Michigan: +0.64 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Western Michigan: +2.21 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Ohio: +0.03 EPA/play11
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@WisconsinL0-17-4.49/18830212.1130-0.03
2@RutgersL17-451.014/232510165.98510.45
4vsUNLVL38-414.37/121312163.42100.07
6@Northern IllinoisW25-14-16.714/261701051.19000.25
7@AkronW20-7-13.914/252031158.06500.45
8vsEastern MichiganW44-30-14.713/221592082.25820.64
9vsWestern MichiganW26-17-1.418/302601076.05212.21
11@OhioL20-24-4.017/251942149.31100.03

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
48.2%
Passing plays
76.5%
Rushing plays
26.0%
Standard downs
44.2%
Passing downs
57.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.18
Passing downs
0.50
Pass / Rush EPA
0.29 / 0.36

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
2023
2022 — 2023 · 25 games
SeasonTeamLine valueWEPA/playYoY ΔTotal EPA
2022Toledo
6.6
0.488205.8
2023Toledo
7.9
0.549+0.06234.3

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.