← Player leaders
Emmett Mosley V is a Versatile WR for Texas.
2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays
6%
projected
band 3%'25 6%10%
Regressed toward the WR mean. Model correlation r≈0.47 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.
2025 Production
Receiving
28 Receptions408 Rec yards3 Rec TD14.6 Yards/rec
Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers
Player type
Versatile WR
Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.
Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency90th %ile · elite
Key findings
- ▸Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
- ▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
- ▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
- ▸5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
- ▸Peak game: 2.21 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Arkansas (SP+ 5).
NIL Market Tier· 2025
On3 valuation ↗Elite
Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.
Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.
Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Opp SP+ | Rec | Rec Yds | Avg | Rec TD | Long | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | @Florida | L21-29 | 3.5 | 2 | 40 | 20.0 | 0 | 22 | — |
| 7 | vsOklahoma | W23-6 | 18.3 | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 | 8 | — |
| 8 | @Kentucky | W16-13 | 1.8 | 1 | 31 | 31.0 | 0 | 31 | — |
| 9 | @Mississippi State | W45-38 | 4.1 | 4 | 53 | 13.3 | 2 | 21 | — |
| 10 | vsVanderbilt | W34-31 | 20.3 | 7 | 69 | 9.9 | 1 | 18 | 0.93 |
| 12 | @Georgia | L10-35 | 24.1 | 3 | 66 | 22.0 | 0 | 40 | 1.85 |
| 13 | vsArkansas | W52-37 | 5.1 | 4 | 81 | 20.3 | 0 | 30 | 2.21 |
| 14 | vsTexas A&M | W27-17 | 20.7 | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 | 9 | 1.86 |
| 1 | vsMichigan | W41-27 | 12.4 | 5 | 51 | 10.2 | 0 | 20 | 0.99 |
Usage & Situational · Pro
Snap-share proxy
Overall
5.9%
Passing plays
10.9%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
6.2%
Passing downs
5.4%
EPA by down type
- Standard downs
- 1.39
- Passing downs
- 1.47
- Pass / Rush EPA
- 1.41 / —
Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).