Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Evan Simon

#12Evan Simon

Evan Simon is a Clutch Passer for Temple. Evan's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 302 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

43%
projected
band 25%'25 50%61%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing
190/314 Comp/Att2098 Pass yards25 Pass TD2 INT60.5% Comp %
Rushing
191 Rush yards2 Rush TD75 Carries2.5 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency61th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.34 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.97 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Massachusetts (SP+ -37).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Massachusetts: +0.97 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Howard: +0.83 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Oklahoma: -0.08 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Georgia Tech: -0.08 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs UTSA: +0.48 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Navy: +0.59 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Charlotte: +0.57 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs East Carolina: -0.04 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Army: +0.22 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Tulane: +0.09 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs North Texas: -0.26 EPA/play14
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@MassachusettsW42-10-36.619/252486095.82100.97
2vsHowardW55-78/101743092.13400.83
3vsOklahomaL3-4218.313/25750017.6-100-0.08
4@Georgia TechL24-459.313/321271037.9680-0.08
6vsUTSAW27-213.716/251812070.92300.48
7vsNavyL31-326.225/363451080.22010.59
8@CharlotteW49-14-26.715/221943076.91610.57
9@TulsaW38-37-10.024/352675072.0170
10vsEast CarolinaL14-458.011/20800129.0-90-0.04
11@ArmyL13-140.815/251571072.41800.22
13vsTulaneL13-376.321/321682049.1-1500.09
14@North TexasL25-5213.810/27821122.880-0.26

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
50.1%
Passing plays
88.5%
Rushing plays
15.7%
Standard downs
42.6%
Passing downs
66.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.20
Passing downs
0.36
Pass / Rush EPA
0.29 / 0.14

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.