Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Fernando Mendoza

#15Fernando Mendoza

Fernando Mendoza is a Dual-Threat QB for Indiana. Fernando's 2025 season ranks in the 50th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 395 plays — a average rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

40%
projected
band 22%'25 42%58%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing
273/379 Comp/Att3535 Pass yards41 Pass TD6 INT72.0% Comp %
Rushing
276 Rush yards7 Rush TD90 Carries3.1 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)50th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency78th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.32 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.95 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Indiana State.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Old Dominion: +0.05 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Kennesaw State: +0.50 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Indiana State: +0.95 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Illinois: +0.87 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Iowa: +0.55 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Oregon: +0.23 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Michigan State: +0.81 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Maryland: +0.30 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Penn State: +0.18 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Wisconsin: +0.38 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Purdue: -0.02 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Ohio State: +0.50 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Oregon: +0.21 EPA/play1Wk 1 vs Alabama: +0.21 EPA/play1Wk 1 vs Miami: +0.21 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsOld DominionW27-145.918/311930066.93310.05
2vsKennesaw StateW56-9-5.418/252454066.62000.50
3vsIndiana StateW73-019/202705093.41910.95
4vsIllinoisW63-1012.921/232675093.6400.87
5@IowaW20-1519.713/232332168.52600.55
7@OregonW30-2025.920/312151188.63100.23
8vsMichigan StateW38-13-3.424/283324097.11800.81
9vsUCLAW56-6-8.715/221683191.3451
10@MarylandW55-100.614/212011196.12410.30
11@Penn StateW27-2418.119/302181175.02010.18
12vsWisconsinW31-7-4.422/242994091.5-2400.38
14@PurdueW56-3-6.18/151172069.4271-0.02
15vsOhio StateW13-1030.115/232221190.2-300.50
1vsOregonW56-2225.917/201775098.52800.21
1vsAlabamaW38-314.814/161923096.71600.21
1vsMiamiW27-2120.716/271860090.6-810.21

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
42.2%
Passing plays
92.2%
Rushing plays
9.5%
Standard downs
37.6%
Passing downs
56.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.30
Passing downs
0.79
Pass / Rush EPA
0.45 / 0.54

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.