Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Gregory DeRosiers

Gregory DeRosiers

Gregory DeRosiers is a Pass-Catching Back for Memphis. Gregory's 2025 season ranks in the 40th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 115 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

18%
projected
band 10%'25 19%25%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
563 Rush yards7 Rush TD99 Carries5.7 Yards/carry
Receiving
32 Receptions228 Rec yards1 Rec TD7.1 Yards/rec
Returns
3 Kick returns40 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)40th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency68th %ile · average
Key findings
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.39 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.85 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Florida Atlantic (SP+ -9).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson20192130.4704.7100.1
Saquon BarkleyPenn State20162880.3403.997.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Chattanooga: +0.76 EPA/play1Wk 4 vs Arkansas: +0.00 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.85 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Tulsa: +0.33 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs UAB: +0.41 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Rice: +0.26 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Tulane: +0.07 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs East Carolina: +0.14 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Navy: -0.17 EPA/play14
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsChattanoogaW45-104266.511400.76
4vsArkansasW32-315.19323.6021200.00
5@Florida AtlanticW55-26-8.71920410.730.85
6vsTulsaW45-7-10.014533.8042510.33
8@UABL24-31-15.811746.7164000.41
9vsSouth FloridaW34-3111.611333.016450
10@RiceW38-14-14.87284.0121600.26
11vsTulaneL32-386.38354.4043700.07
12@East CarolinaL27-318.09535.9033000.14
14vsNavyL17-286.27253.604190-0.17

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
18.9%
Passing plays
9.9%
Rushing plays
28.9%
Standard downs
21.1%
Passing downs
14.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.29
Passing downs
0.33
Pass / Rush EPA
0.30 / 0.30

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.