#10Haynes King

QB·Georgia Tech·2025 2023

Haynes King is a Dual-Threat QB for Georgia Tech. Haynes's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 492 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

49%

projected

band 31%'25 62%67%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing

252/361 Comp/Att2951 Pass yards14 Pass TD6 INT69.8% Comp %

Rushing

953 Rush yards15 Rush TD185 Carries5.2 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

Player type

Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency62th %ile · average

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
▸4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.20 from the first to second half of the season.
▸Peak game: 2.70 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Syracuse (SP+ -13).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	C/ATT	Pass Yds	Pass TD	INT	QBR	Rush Yds	Rush TD	EPA/play
1	@Colorado	W27-20	-8.3	13/20	143	0	1	89.1	156	3	0.57
3	vsClemson	W24-21	9.5	20/28	211	0	0	69.1	103	1	0.33
4	vsTemple	W45-24	-5.1	13/18	161	2	0	65.7	15	1	0.35
5	@Wake Forest	W30-29	5.7	28/42	243	1	0	73.9	106	2	0.10
7	vsVirginia Tech	W35-20	-10.1	20/24	213	1	0	92.8	60	2	0.61
8	@Duke	W27-18	6.6	14/21	205	0	0	85.9	120	1	0.66
9	vsSyracuse	W41-16	-13.1	25/31	304	3	0	93.2	91	2	2.70
10	@NC State	L36-48	4.8	25/35	408	2	1	84.2	103	2	0.30
12	@Boston College	W36-34	-8.5	26/34	371	1	0	74.6	53	0	0.36
13	vsPittsburgh	L28-42	8.4	27/41	257	2	2	33.9	76	1	0.13
14	vsGeorgia	L9-16	24.1	19/27	181	0	1	63.2	39	0	0.13
1	vsBYU	L21-25	15.9	22/40	254	2	1	82.8	31	0	0.20

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

61.6%

Passing plays

90.1%

Rushing plays

38.2%

Standard downs

56.6%

Passing downs

76.2%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.26
Passing downs: 0.46
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.35 / 0.32

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg

2023 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.