← Player leaders
Isaiah Neyor is a Vertical Threat WR for Wyoming. Isaiah's 2021 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 54 plays — a elite rate for the WR.
2021 Production
Rushing
23 Rush yards1 Rush TD12 Carries1.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
44 Receptions878 Rec yards12 Rec TD20.0 Yards/rec
Performance Analysis · 2021 · vs WR peers
Player type
Vertical Threat WR
Elite deep receiver who stretches the field. Wins downfield, commands safety attention, and creates the threat that opens underneath routes.
Downfield threatYAC upsideCreates space for teammates
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency81th %ile · above avg
Key findings
- ▸Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
- ▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
- ▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
- ▸11 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
- ▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
- ▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 1.07 from the first to second half of the season.
- ▸Peak game: 2.48 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs San José State (SP+ -2).
NIL Market Tier· 2021
On3 valuation ↗Elite
Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.
Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.
Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Opp SP+ | Rec | Rec Yds | Avg | Rec TD | Long | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vsMontana State | W19-16 | — | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 0 | 21 | 0.74 |
| 2 | @Northern Illinois | W50-43 | -7.1 | 4 | 87 | 21.8 | 2 | 33 | 0.67 |
| 3 | vsBall State | W45-12 | -11.2 | 4 | 84 | 21.0 | 0 | 37 | 0.58 |
| 4 | @UConn | W24-22 | -25.6 | 2 | 24 | 12.0 | 1 | 18 | 1.40 |
| 6 | @Air Force | L14-24 | 7.4 | 3 | 55 | 18.3 | 1 | 37 | 0.17 |
| 7 | vsFresno State | L0-17 | 10.8 | 2 | 18 | 9.0 | 0 | 14 | 0.16 |
| 8 | vsNew Mexico | L3-14 | -18.6 | 2 | 45 | 22.5 | 0 | 38 | 1.04 |
| 9 | @San José State | L21-27 | -1.9 | 3 | 72 | 24.0 | 2 | 54 | 2.48 |
| 10 | vsColorado State | W31-17 | -2.4 | 3 | 45 | 15.0 | 2 | 25 | 1.06 |
| 11 | @Boise State | L13-23 | 9.4 | 6 | 126 | 21.0 | 1 | 74 | 1.80 |
| 12 | @Utah State | W44-17 | 0.1 | 4 | 125 | 31.3 | 1 | 40 | 1.80 |
| 13 | vsHawai'i | L14-38 | -2.3 | 3 | 78 | 26.0 | 1 | 34 | 2.29 |
| 1 | vsKent State | W52-38 | -6.4 | 5 | 87 | 17.4 | 1 | 42 | 0.74 |
Usage & Situational · Pro
Snap-share proxy
Overall
7.5%
Passing plays
16.8%
Rushing plays
1.9%
Standard downs
8.1%
Passing downs
6.3%
EPA by down type
- Standard downs
- 0.81
- Passing downs
- 1.68
- Pass / Rush EPA
- 1.20 / 0.07
Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).