Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Ismail Mahdi

#21Ismail Mahdi

Ismail Mahdi is a Explosive Back for Arizona. Ismail's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 137 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

16%
projected
band 9%'25 17%23%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
853 Rush yards4 Rush TD133 Carries6.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
17 Receptions119 Rec yards1 Rec TD7.0 Yards/rec
Returns
4 Kick returns82 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency56th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.19 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.44 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs Colorado (SP+ -8).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State20162880.3403.997.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Hawai'i: +0.18 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Weber State: +0.47 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Kansas State: +0.49 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Iowa State: +0.17 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Oklahoma State: +0.10 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs BYU: -0.22 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Houston: +0.03 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Colorado: +1.44 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Kansas: +0.35 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Cincinnati: +0.35 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Baylor: +0.19 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Arizona State: -0.20 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs SMU: +0.21 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsHawai'iW40-61.76233.811-300.18
2vsWeber StateW48-39515.7012710.47
3vsKansas StateW23-177.0221898.6023200.49
5@Iowa StateL14-399.913856.503800.17
6vsOklahoma StateW41-13-15.114342.400.10
7vsBYUL27-3315.97213.003100-0.22
8@HoustonL28-317.46427.001500.03
10@ColoradoW52-17-8.338528.311.44
11vsKansasW24-204.17618.700.35
12@CincinnatiW30-244.57486.910.35
13vsBaylorW41-171.414936.6111100.19
14@Arizona StateW23-73.914533.80160-0.20
1vsSMUL19-2413.411686.2042300.21

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
16.6%
Passing plays
3.9%
Rushing plays
30.8%
Standard downs
19.2%
Passing downs
10.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.13
Passing downs
0.31
Pass / Rush EPA
0.15 / 0.17

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
2023 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.