Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Jacob Clark

#12Jacob Clark

Jacob Clark is a Dual-Threat QB for Missouri State. Jacob's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 378 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

45%
projected
band 27%'25 54%63%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing
247/376 Comp/Att3244 Pass yards28 Pass TD11 INT65.7% Comp %
Rushing
-16 Rush yards3 Rush TD94 Carries-0.2 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency72th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.11 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.75 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs UT Martin.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs USC: -0.13 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Marshall: +0.64 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs SMU: +0.08 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs UT Martin: +0.75 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Western Kentucky: +0.26 EPA/play5Wk 10 vs Florida International: +0.22 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Liberty: +0.18 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs UTEP: +0.37 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Kennesaw State: +0.16 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.20 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Arkansas State: +0.11 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@USCL13-7316.916/241471218.9-250-0.13
2@MarshallW21-20-4.521/313593151.33000.64
3vsSMUL10-2813.423/372751329.2-2000.08
4vsUT MartinW42-1020/282713072.52220.75
5vsWestern KentuckyL22-271.68/151430050.71600.26
9@New Mexico StateW24-17-15.528/442833241.8-170
10vsFlorida InternationalW28-21-10.516/271632063.43500.22
11@LibertyW21-17-9.020/332862061.1-1510.18
12vsUTEPW38-24-17.530/393304076.8-500.37
13@Kennesaw StateL34-41-5.423/323443270.4-200.16
14vsLouisiana TechL30-42-1.317/312942170.0-1100.20
1vsArkansas StateL28-34-8.825/353494042.6-2400.11

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
54.1%
Passing plays
87.2%
Rushing plays
14.4%
Standard downs
46.6%
Passing downs
68.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.24
Passing downs
0.32
Pass / Rush EPA
0.26 / 0.46

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.