Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Jake Retzlaff

#12Jake Retzlaff

Jake Retzlaff is a Dual-Threat QB for Tulane. Jake's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 480 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

45%
projected
band 27%'25 53%63%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing
242/391 Comp/Att3168 Pass yards15 Pass TD7 INT61.9% Comp %
Rushing
634 Rush yards16 Rush TD129 Carries4.9 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency78th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.66 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Army (SP+ 1).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Northwestern: +0.14 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs South Alabama: +0.23 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Duke: +0.47 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Ole Miss: -0.13 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Tulsa: +0.32 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs East Carolina: +0.64 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Army: +0.66 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs UTSA: +0.17 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Memphis: +0.47 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.26 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Temple: +0.22 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Charlotte: +0.09 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs North Texas: +0.53 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Ole Miss: +0.07 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsNorthwesternW23-35.818/311521077.711310.14
2@South AlabamaW33-31-12.713/241251074.56410.23
3vsDukeW34-276.615/232450094.711140.47
4@Ole MissL10-4524.05/17560037.2510-0.13
5@TulsaW31-14-10.017/302420059.02910.32
7vsEast CarolinaW26-198.026/363472079.62000.64
8vsArmyW24-170.822/292612189.96210.66
10@UTSAL26-483.714/281941258.36310.17
11@MemphisW38-327.616/233323095.44310.47
12vsFlorida AtlanticW35-24-8.718/272412167.5110.26
13@TempleW37-13-5.117/282312068.6810.22
14vsCharlotteW27-0-26.728/382910239.3-420.09
15vsNorth TexasW34-2113.813/221450076.94920.53
1@Ole MissL10-4124.020/353061137.92400.07

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
53.0%
Passing plays
90.5%
Rushing plays
21.9%
Standard downs
49.6%
Passing downs
61.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.19
Passing downs
0.53
Pass / Rush EPA
0.31 / 0.35

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.