Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Javen Jacobs

Javen Jacobs

Javen Jacobs is a Pass-Catching Back for Utah State. Javen's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 95 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

14%
projected
band 7%'25 13%21%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
429 Rush yards5 Rush TD65 Carries6.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
43 Receptions379 Rec yards3 Rec TD8.8 Yards/rec
Returns
11 Kick returns219 KR yards0 KR TD8 Punt returns31 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency42th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.34 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.68 EPA/play in Wk 14 vs Boise State (SP+ 3).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs UTEP: -0.29 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Texas A&M: -0.09 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Air Force: +0.48 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs McNeese: -0.62 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Vanderbilt: +0.60 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Hawai'i: +0.28 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs San José State: -0.03 EPA/play8Wk 11 vs Nevada: +0.13 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs UNLV: +0.27 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Fresno State: +0.33 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Boise State: +0.68 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Washington State: +0.61 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsUTEPW28-16-17.54123.00100-0.29
2@Texas A&ML22-4420.78324.003190-0.09
3vsAir ForceW49-30-3.29717.9133600.48
4vsMcNeeseW48-77223.113100-0.62
5@VanderbiltL35-5520.346315.8064810.60
7@Hawai'iL26-441.7200.0023410.28
8vsSan José StateW30-25-14.37111.603410-0.03
9@New MexicoL14-330.96315.203130
11vsNevadaW51-14-13.4111.0076300.13
12@UNLVL26-294.3122.0011200.27
13@Fresno StateW28-171.88688.522400.33
14vsBoise StateL24-253.159218.4145300.68
1vsWashington StateL21-343.83248.0054610.61

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
12.7%
Passing plays
11.4%
Rushing plays
14.4%
Standard downs
14.1%
Passing downs
9.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.08
Passing downs
0.38
Pass / Rush EPA
0.41 / -0.07

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.