Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Javonte Vereen

#11Javonte Vereen

TE·UConn·2025

Javonte Vereen is a Red Zone Weapon TE for UConn.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

4%
projected
band 2%'25 6%6%

Regressed toward the TE mean. Model correlation r≈0.42 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Receiving
21 Receptions305 Rec yards5 Rec TD14.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyPass-Down
Player type
Red Zone Weapon TE

Goes from good to great inside the 20 — high TD conversion on limited looks makes this receiver a scoring machine.

Red zone targetHigh TD rateSize/catch radius advantage
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency74th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.57 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 2.87 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Delaware (SP+ -11).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · TE · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Ty ThompsonTulane2024480.4200.420.2
Seth GreenMinnesota2018830.3900.032.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Central Connecticut: +1.05 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs Delaware: +2.87 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Buffalo: +1.47 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Florida International: -0.15 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Boston College: +1.34 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs UAB: +0.83 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Duke: +0.04 EPA/play11
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsCentral ConnecticutW59-1323819.00301.05
3@DelawareL41-44-10.912424.00242.87
5@BuffaloW20-17-7.522814.00151.47
6vsFlorida InternationalW51-10-10.53258.3016-0.15
8@Boston CollegeW38-23-8.548220.52501.34
9@RiceL34-37-14.823819.0134
10vsUABW38-19-15.83248.01100.83
11vsDukeW37-346.644611.51150.04

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
5.6%
Passing plays
10.2%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
4.1%
Passing downs
8.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
1.07
Passing downs
0.62
Pass / Rush EPA
0.81 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.