Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Jeffery Pittman

#0Jeffery Pittman

Jeffery Pittman is a Committee Back for Southern Miss. Jeffery's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 163 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

19%
projected
band 12%'25 22%27%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
695 Rush yards8 Rush TD156 Carries4.5 Yards/carry
Receiving
25 Receptions107 Rec yards0 Rec TD4.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency53th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.12 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.59 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs App State (SP+ -11).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State20162880.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State20162920.3404.399.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Mississippi State: -0.18 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Jackson State: +0.09 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs App State: +0.59 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Jacksonville State: +0.21 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Georgia Southern: +0.31 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Louisiana: +0.06 EPA/play8Wk 11 vs Arkansas State: -0.01 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Texas State: +0.16 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs South Alabama: -0.04 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Troy: -0.03 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Western Kentucky: +0.31 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsMississippi StateL17-344.19161.806520-0.18
2vsJackson StateW38-2010717.101200.09
3vsApp StateW38-22-11.46396.524900.59
5vsJacksonville StateW42-25-6.718804.420.21
7@Georgia SouthernW38-35-9.4311404.521100.31
8@LouisianaW22-10-10.121733.501300.06
11@Arkansas StateW27-21-8.818754.20230-0.01
12vsTexas StateL14-412.311544.9111100.16
13@South AlabamaL35-42-12.712413.41520-0.04
14vsTroyL18-28-4.810515.102100-0.03
1vsWestern KentuckyL16-271.610555.5021400.31

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
22.0%
Passing plays
6.2%
Rushing plays
39.1%
Standard downs
26.3%
Passing downs
14.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.11
Passing downs
0.25
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.22 / 0.19

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.