Jeremiah Cobb is a Committee Back for Auburn. Jeremiah's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 155 plays — a developing rate for the RB.
2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays
Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.
2025 Production
Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers
Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.
- ▸Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
- ▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.32 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
- ▸Peak game: 0.65 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Ball State (SP+ -23).
NIL Market Tier· 2025
On3 valuation ↗Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.
Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.
Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value
Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.
| Player | Team | Yr | Plays | WEPA/play | Line val | Total EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saquon Barkley | Penn State | 2016 | 288 | 0.340 | 3.9 | 97.9 |
Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.
Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Opp SP+ | Car | Rush Yds | Avg | Rush TD | Rec | Rec Yds | Rec TD | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @Baylor | W38-24 | 1.4 | 16 | 74 | 4.6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.20 |
| 2 | vsBall State | W42-3 | -23.0 | 11 | 121 | 11.0 | 2 | — | — | — | 0.65 |
| 3 | vsSouth Alabama | W31-15 | -12.7 | 19 | 119 | 6.3 | 1 | — | — | — | 0.31 |
| 4 | @Oklahoma | L17-24 | 18.3 | 6 | 61 | 10.2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.42 |
| 5 | @Texas A&M | L10-16 | 20.7 | 6 | 28 | 4.7 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 0.16 |
| 7 | vsGeorgia | L10-20 | 24.1 | 12 | 50 | 4.2 | 0 | — | — | — | -0.01 |
| 8 | vsMissouri | L17-23 | 14.4 | 19 | 111 | 5.8 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.18 |
| 9 | @Arkansas | W33-24 | 5.1 | 28 | 153 | 5.5 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 0 | — |
| 10 | vsKentucky | L3-10 | 1.8 | 20 | 72 | 3.6 | 0 | — | — | — | -0.20 |
| 11 | @Vanderbilt | L38-45 | 20.3 | 16 | 115 | 7.2 | 0 | 4 | 34 | 0 | 0.23 |
| 13 | vsMercer | W62-17 | — | 12 | 32 | 2.7 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 0 | -0.19 |
| 14 | vsAlabama | L20-27 | 14.8 | 10 | 33 | 3.3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 0 | -0.19 |
Usage & Situational · Pro
- Standard downs
- 0.12
- Passing downs
- 0.04
- Pass / Rush EPA
- -0.06 / 0.13
Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).