Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Jevon Jackson

#4Jevon Jackson

RB·UAB·2025

Jevon Jackson is a Committee Back for UAB. Jevon's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 171 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

20%
projected
band 13%'25 23%27%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
900 Rush yards5 Rush TD167 Carries5.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
19 Receptions115 Rec yards1 Rec TD6.1 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.63 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs North Texas (SP+ 14).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State20162880.3403.997.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Alabama State: +0.38 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Navy: +0.21 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Akron: -0.17 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Tennessee: -0.37 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Army: +0.18 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Florida Atlantic: -0.25 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Memphis: -0.13 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs UConn: +0.19 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Rice: -0.11 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs North Texas: +0.63 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs South Florida: -0.41 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Tulsa: +0.20 EPA/play14
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsAlabama StateW52-42171669.820.38
2@NavyL24-386.215664.4121800.21
3vsAkronW31-28-13.914453.203171-0.17
4@TennesseeL24-5615.0530.605240-0.37
6vsArmyL13-310.812897.4011100.18
7@Florida AtlanticL33-53-8.78192.403370-0.25
8vsMemphisW31-247.617543.20-0.13
10@UConnL19-385.19616.800.19
11@RiceL17-24-14.815895.90-0.11
12vsNorth TexasL24-5313.8161599.903800.63
13vsSouth FloridaL18-4811.616322.00200-0.41
14@TulsaW31-24-10.0231175.120.20

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
22.7%
Passing plays
5.2%
Rushing plays
45.4%
Standard downs
28.4%
Passing downs
9.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.01
Passing downs
0.56
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.18 / 0.10

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.