Joey Labas

QB·Central Michigan·2025

Joey Labas is a Clutch Passer for Central Michigan. Joey's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 220 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

35%

projected

band 17%'25 32%53%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing

147/208 Comp/Att1854 Pass yards13 Pass TD6 INT70.7% Comp %

Rushing

-17 Rush yards0 Rush TD54 Carries-0.3 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

Player type

Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency71th %ile · average

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.17 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 1.18 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Wagner.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	C/ATT	Pass Yds	Pass TD	INT	QBR	Rush Yds	EPA/play
1	@San José State	W16-14	-14.3	5/10	56	0	0	20.2	7	0.16
2	@Pittsburgh	L17-45	8.4	11/14	89	1	0	57.4	11	0.40
3	@Michigan	L3-63	12.4	4/8	36	0	1	1.6	-21	-0.04
4	vsWagner	W49-10	—	12/14	241	3	0	99.5	7	1.18
5	vsEastern Michigan	W24-13	-14.7	14/16	138	1	0	76.2	6	0.60
6	@Akron	L22-28	-13.9	12/21	134	0	0	20.0	-27	0.06
8	@Bowling Green	W27-6	-12.6	2/4	72	0	0	77.0	30	0.85
9	vsMassachusetts	W38-13	-36.6	10/11	148	2	0	72.7	5	—
10	@Western Michigan	L21-24	-1.4	8/11	152	1	1	46.3	0	0.37
12	vsBuffalo	W38-19	-7.5	18/24	247	2	2	37.9	-3	0.32
13	@Kent State	W28-16	-19.3	11/20	121	2	1	40.5	11	0.21
14	vsToledo	L3-21	6.0	19/30	242	0	1	36.3	-30	0.01
1	vsNorthwestern	L7-34	5.8	21/25	178	1	0	37.9	-13	0.20

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

32.3%

Passing plays

80.2%

Rushing plays

6.4%

Standard downs

25.9%

Passing downs

45.6%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.18
Passing downs: 0.41
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.33 / 0.04

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).