Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Jordan Marshall

#23Jordan Marshall

Jordan Marshall is a Explosive Back for Michigan. Jordan's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 138 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

20%
projected
band 13%'25 23%27%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
932 Rush yards10 Rush TD150 Carries6.2 Yards/carry
Receiving
9 Receptions92 Rec yards0 Rec TD10.2 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency45th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Peak game: 0.83 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Nebraska (SP+ 6).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State20162880.3403.997.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs New Mexico: -0.10 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Oklahoma: -0.17 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Central Michigan: +0.08 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Nebraska: +0.83 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Wisconsin: +0.17 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs USC: +0.02 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Washington: +0.29 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Purdue: +0.25 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Northwestern: +0.27 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Ohio State: -0.13 EPA/play14
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsNew MexicoW34-170.911292.60150-0.10
2@OklahomaL13-2418.39283.10-0.17
3vsCentral MichiganW63-3-8.810525.220.08
4@NebraskaW30-276.268013.310.83
6vsWisconsinW24-10-4.49444.901800.17
7@USCL13-3116.914684.9011600.02
8vsWashingtonW24-718.4251335.3132000.29
9@Michigan StateW31-20-3.4151107.31
10vsPurdueW21-16-6.1251857.4312500.25
12vsNorthwesternW24-225.8191427.521800.27
14vsOhio StateL9-2730.17618.701100-0.13

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
22.9%
Passing plays
4.8%
Rushing plays
37.1%
Standard downs
26.1%
Passing downs
15.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.19
Passing downs
-0.01
Pass / Rush EPA
0.26 / 0.14

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.