Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Justice Haynes

#22Justice Haynes

Justice Haynes is a Featured Back for Michigan. Justice's 2025 season ranks in the 40th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 98 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

23%
projected
band 16%'25 28%30%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
857 Rush yards10 Rush TD121 Carries7.1 Yards/carry
Receiving
13 Receptions50 Rec yards0 Rec TD3.8 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)40th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency81th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.13 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.63 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs New Mexico (SP+ 1).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson20192130.4704.7100.1

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs New Mexico: +0.63 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Oklahoma: +0.05 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Central Michigan: +0.32 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Nebraska: +0.54 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Wisconsin: +0.31 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs USC: +0.10 EPA/play7
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsNew MexicoW34-170.9161599.932600.63
2@OklahomaL13-2418.3191256.613-500.05
3vsCentral MichiganW63-3-8.8141047.4111600.32
4@NebraskaW30-276.2171498.8131200.54
6vsWisconsinW24-10-4.4191176.220.31
7@USCL13-3116.910515.101200.10
9@Michigan StateW31-20-3.4261525.823190

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
28.4%
Passing plays
7.9%
Rushing plays
44.5%
Standard downs
31.0%
Passing downs
22.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.30
Passing downs
0.32
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.09 / 0.37

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.