Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Kaidon Salter

#3Kaidon Salter

Kaidon Salter is a Dual-Threat QB for Colorado. Kaidon's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 265 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

44%
projected
band 26%'25 52%62%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing
127/204 Comp/Att1414 Pass yards10 Pass TD7 INT62.3% Comp %
Rushing
357 Rush yards5 Rush TD104 Carries3.4 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency80th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.70 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Wyoming (SP+ -11).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Georgia Tech: +0.29 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Delaware: +0.18 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Wyoming: +0.70 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs BYU: +0.15 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs TCU: +0.22 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Iowa State: +0.57 EPA/play7Wk 10 vs Arizona: +0.20 EPA/play10Wk 14 vs Kansas State: +0.12 EPA/play14
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsGeorgia TechL20-279.317/281591057.64310.29
2vsDelawareW31-7-10.913/161020072.22510.18
4vsWyomingW37-20-11.318/283043093.88610.70
5vsBYUL21-2415.911/161191165.04910.15
6@TCUL21-358.318/292172363.41110.22
7vsIowa StateW24-179.916/252552088.15700.57
9@UtahL7-5322.29/22370110.7-40
10vsArizonaL17-5212.011/15491149.12700.20
14@Kansas StateL14-247.014/251720177.16300.12

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
51.6%
Passing plays
83.6%
Rushing plays
26.3%
Standard downs
44.6%
Passing downs
64.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.24
Passing downs
0.45
Pass / Rush EPA
0.31 / 0.42

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.