Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Kamari Moulton

#28Kamari Moulton

RB·Iowa·2025

Kamari Moulton is a Featured Back for Iowa. Kamari's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 172 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

23%
projected
band 16%'25 29%30%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
878 Rush yards5 Rush TD170 Carries5.2 Yards/carry
Receiving
16 Receptions97 Rec yards0 Rec TD6.1 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency50th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.21 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.64 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs UAlbany.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State20162880.3403.997.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs UAlbany: +0.64 EPA/play1Wk 4 vs Rutgers: +0.27 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Indiana: -0.20 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Wisconsin: +0.49 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Penn State: +0.06 EPA/play8Wk 11 vs Oregon: -0.09 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs USC: +0.08 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Michigan State: +0.03 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Nebraska: -0.00 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Vanderbilt: +0.19 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsUAlbanyW34-73227.300.64
4@RutgersW38-281.014684.9132100.27
5vsIndianaL15-2032.418754.203210-0.20
7@WisconsinW37-0-4.415966.4132900.49
8vsPenn StateW25-2418.117995.8021000.06
9vsMinnesotaW41-31.515755.00
11vsOregonL16-1825.923873.801-10-0.09
12@USCL21-2616.915906.001100.08
13vsMichigan StateW20-17-3.418784.3021400.03
14@NebraskaW40-166.218935.22-0.00
1vsVanderbiltW34-2720.314956.811200.19

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
28.8%
Passing plays
10.5%
Rushing plays
40.6%
Standard downs
32.5%
Passing downs
18.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.05
Passing downs
0.27
Pass / Rush EPA
0.03 / 0.09

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.