Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Keyjuan Brown

#22Keyjuan Brown

Keyjuan Brown is a Explosive Back for Louisville. Keyjuan's 2025 season ranks in the 38th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 94 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

16%
projected
band 9%'25 16%23%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
704 Rush yards6 Rush TD96 Carries7.3 Yards/carry
Receiving
12 Receptions118 Rec yards0 Rec TD9.8 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns65 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)38th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency32th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.18 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.83 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Bowling Green (SP+ -13).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson20192130.4704.7100.1

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Eastern Kentucky: +0.28 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs James Madison: -0.18 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Bowling Green: +0.83 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Virginia: +0.08 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Miami: -0.57 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Virginia Tech: +0.02 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs California: +0.55 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Clemson: +0.37 EPA/play12Wk 1 vs Toledo: +0.14 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsEastern KentuckyW51-176254.2121200.28
2vsJames MadisonW28-1412.3410.30-0.18
4vsBowling GreenW40-17-12.612847.0223500.83
6vsVirginiaL27-3011.13165.301000.08
8@MiamiW24-2120.7561.201120-0.57
9vsBoston CollegeW38-24-8.510959.511380
10@Virginia TechW28-16-10.112947.821200.02
11vsCaliforniaL26-29-3.2141369.701500.55
12vsClemsonL19-209.5151359.0021400.37
1vsToledoW27-226.0151127.501000.14

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
16.4%
Passing plays
4.2%
Rushing plays
32.0%
Standard downs
19.2%
Passing downs
8.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.36
Passing downs
-0.10
Pass / Rush EPA
0.22 / 0.31

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.