← Player leaders
Landen King is a Red Zone Weapon TE for Duke.
2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays
4%
projected
band 2%'25 3%6%
Regressed toward the TE mean. Model correlation r≈0.42 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.
2025 Production
Receiving
15 Receptions203 Rec yards4 Rec TD13.5 Yards/rec
Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers
Player type
Red Zone Weapon TE
Goes from good to great inside the 20 — high TD conversion on limited looks makes this receiver a scoring machine.
Red zone targetHigh TD rateSize/catch radius advantage
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency80th %ile · above avg
Key findings
- ▸Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
- ▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
- ▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
- ▸7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
- ▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.79 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
- ▸Peak game: 2.63 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Tulane (SP+ 6).
NIL Market Tier· 2025
On3 valuation ↗Elite
Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.
Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.
Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Opp SP+ | Rec | Rec Yds | Avg | Rec TD | Long | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vsElon | W45-17 | — | 1 | 19 | 19.0 | 0 | 19 | 1.56 |
| 2 | vsIllinois | L19-45 | 12.9 | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | 3 | -0.24 |
| 3 | @Tulane | L27-34 | 6.3 | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 1 | 3 | 2.63 |
| 4 | vsNC State | W45-33 | 4.8 | 1 | 17 | 17.0 | 1 | 17 | 2.58 |
| 6 | @California | W45-21 | -3.2 | 1 | 33 | 33.0 | 0 | 33 | 2.17 |
| 8 | vsGeorgia Tech | L18-27 | 9.3 | 3 | 34 | 11.3 | 1 | 20 | 0.96 |
| 10 | @Clemson | W46-45 | 9.5 | 2 | 24 | 12.0 | 0 | 16 | 0.39 |
| 11 | @UConn | L34-37 | 5.1 | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| 12 | vsVirginia | L17-34 | 11.1 | 2 | 48 | 24.0 | 0 | 32 | 1.16 |
| 15 | vsVirginia | W27-20 | 11.1 | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 0 | 16 | 1.29 |
Usage & Situational · Pro
Snap-share proxy
Overall
2.9%
Passing plays
5.0%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
3.9%
Passing downs
0.5%
EPA by down type
- Standard downs
- 1.19
- Passing downs
- 0.73
- Pass / Rush EPA
- 1.16 / —
Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).