← Player leaders
#13Landon Ellis
Landon Ellis is a Slot Specialist WR for James Madison. Landon's 2025 season produced 51.0 total EPA across 44 plays.
2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays
6%
projected
band 3%'25 6%10%
Regressed toward the WR mean. Model correlation r≈0.47 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.
2025 Production
Receiving
36 Receptions624 Rec yards5 Rec TD17.3 Yards/rec
Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers
Player type
Slot Specialist WR
The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.
3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency83th %ile · above avg
Key findings
- ▸Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
- ▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
- ▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
- ▸9 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
- ▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
- ▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.68 from the first to second half of the season.
- ▸Peak game: 2.72 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Oregon (SP+ 26).
NIL Market Tier· 2025
On3 valuation ↗Elite
Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.
Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.
Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Opp SP+ | Rec | Rec Yds | Avg | Rec TD | Long | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vsWeber State | W45-10 | — | 2 | 20 | 10.0 | 1 | 14 | 1.44 |
| 2 | @Louisville | L14-28 | 12.4 | 3 | 55 | 18.3 | 0 | 26 | 0.95 |
| 4 | @Liberty | W31-13 | -9.0 | 3 | 40 | 13.3 | 1 | 21 | 0.37 |
| 5 | vsGeorgia Southern | W35-10 | -9.4 | 2 | 40 | 20.0 | 0 | 21 | 0.64 |
| 6 | @Georgia State | W14-7 | -24.5 | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 0 | 13 | 0.14 |
| 7 | vsLouisiana | W24-14 | -10.1 | 6 | 120 | 20.0 | 3 | 62 | 1.52 |
| 8 | vsOld Dominion | W63-27 | 5.9 | 6 | 97 | 16.2 | 0 | 36 | 1.12 |
| 10 | @Texas State | W52-20 | 2.3 | 2 | 37 | 18.5 | 0 | 26 | 0.86 |
| 11 | @Marshall | W35-23 | -4.5 | 3 | 49 | 16.3 | 0 | 20 | 1.57 |
| 12 | vsApp State | W58-10 | -11.4 | 2 | 46 | 23.0 | 0 | 30 | 1.36 |
| 15 | vsTroy | W31-14 | -4.8 | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 | 9 | — |
| 1 | @Oregon | L34-51 | 25.9 | 3 | 83 | 27.7 | 0 | 50 | 2.72 |
Usage & Situational · Pro
Snap-share proxy
Overall
5.7%
Passing plays
13.9%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
4.6%
Passing downs
8.1%
EPA by down type
- Standard downs
- 0.79
- Passing downs
- 1.60
- Pass / Rush EPA
- 1.16 / —
Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).