Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Landon Sims

#30Landon Sims

Landon Sims is a Pass-Catching Back for Hawai'i. Landon's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 160 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

17%
projected
band 10%'25 18%24%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
559 Rush yards3 Rush TD122 Carries4.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
37 Receptions272 Rec yards2 Rec TD7.4 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency66th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.13 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.46 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Portland State.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State20162880.3403.997.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Stanford: +0.40 EPA/play1Wk 1 vs Arizona: +0.40 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Sam Houston: -0.10 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Portland State: +0.46 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Fresno State: -0.10 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Air Force: +0.24 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Utah State: +0.39 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Colorado State: +0.06 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs San José State: +0.06 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs San Diego State: +0.03 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs UNLV: +0.04 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Wyoming: +0.26 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs California: +0.05 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsStanfordW23-20-11.87121.7043200.40
1@ArizonaL6-4012.09414.6034800.40
2vsSam HoustonW37-20-27.814604.307291-0.10
3vsPortland StateW23-39414.6044600.46
4vsFresno StateL21-231.87304.30230-0.10
5@Air ForceW44-35-3.213574.4123700.24
7vsUtah StateW44-26-3.110828.211900.39
8@Colorado StateW31-19-15.612594.903900.06
10@San José StateL38-45-14.313574.4141810.06
11vsSan Diego StateW38-66.710484.801200.03
13@UNLVL10-384.37263.7032200.04
14vsWyomingW27-7-11.32105.000.26
1vsCaliforniaW35-31-3.29364.0031700.05

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
17.9%
Passing plays
7.6%
Rushing plays
35.3%
Standard downs
20.0%
Passing downs
13.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.06
Passing downs
0.26
Pass / Rush EPA
0.31 / 0.05

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.