Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Leshon Williams

#4Leshon Williams

Leshon Williams is a Explosive Back for Kansas. Leshon's 2025 season ranks in the 3th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 97 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

16%
projected
band 9%'25 16%23%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
565 Rush yards7 Rush TD97 Carries5.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
5 Receptions73 Rec yards2 Rec TD14.6 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)3th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency37th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.27 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.61 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Iowa State (SP+ 10).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Fresno State: +0.83 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Missouri: -0.69 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs West Virginia: +0.18 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Cincinnati: -0.00 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs UCF: +0.48 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Texas Tech: +0.30 EPA/play7Wk 10 vs Oklahoma State: +0.25 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Arizona: -0.36 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Iowa State: +1.61 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Utah: +0.22 EPA/play14
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsFresno StateW31-71.86579.5111600.83
2@MissouriL31-4214.4300.00-0.69
4vsWest VirginiaW41-10-6.8191296.8113910.18
5vsCincinnatiL34-374.510646.40-0.00
6@UCFW27-20-1.212584.830.48
7@Texas TechL17-4227.6561.2011010.30
9vsKansas StateL17-427.0252.50
10vsOklahoma StateW38-21-15.114775.511700.25
11@ArizonaL20-2412.07233.30110-0.36
13@Iowa StateL14-389.944210.511.61
14vsUtahL21-3122.2151046.900.22

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
15.7%
Passing plays
2.5%
Rushing plays
27.5%
Standard downs
18.4%
Passing downs
8.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.25
Passing downs
0.06
Pass / Rush EPA
0.75 / 0.18

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.