Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Liam Szarka

#9Liam Szarka

Liam Szarka is a Dual-Threat QB for Air Force. Liam's 2025 season ranks in the 8th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 301 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

40%
projected
band 22%'25 44%58%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing
75/120 Comp/Att1294 Pass yards9 Pass TD5 INT62.5% Comp %
Rushing
922 Rush yards13 Rush TD190 Carries4.9 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)8th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency66th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.54 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.89 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Bucknell.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Bucknell: +0.89 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs Utah State: +0.21 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Boise State: +0.76 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Hawai'i: +0.81 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Navy: +0.47 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs UNLV: +0.47 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Wyoming: +0.21 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Army: +0.34 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs San José State: -0.04 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs UConn: -0.52 EPA/play12
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsBucknellW49-132/2470096.8700.89
3@Utah StateL30-49-3.16/14670134.94030.21
4vsBoise StateL37-493.113/182462193.911010.76
5vsHawai'iL35-441.710/122783188.513900.81
6@NavyL31-346.211/192122080.715220.47
7@UNLVL48-514.310/171751079.313620.47
8vsWyomingW24-21-11.33/8330047.714110.21
10vsArmyL17-200.813/171610249.39120.34
11@San José StateW26-16-14.35/10411033.6872-0.04
12@UConnL16-265.12/334005.7190-0.52

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
43.8%
Passing plays
80.4%
Rushing plays
33.3%
Standard downs
38.1%
Passing downs
61.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.34
Passing downs
0.48
Pass / Rush EPA
0.59 / 0.27

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.