Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
London Montgomery

#7London Montgomery

London Montgomery is a Committee Back for East Carolina. London's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 161 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

17%
projected
band 10%'25 18%24%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
742 Rush yards7 Rush TD156 Carries4.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
15 Receptions76 Rec yards0 Rec TD5.1 Yards/rec
Returns
5 Kick returns114 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency61th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Peak game: 0.55 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Campbell.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State20162880.3403.997.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs NC State: -0.13 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Campbell: +0.55 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Coastal Carolina: +0.14 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs BYU: +0.25 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Army: +0.04 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Tulane: +0.14 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Tulsa: +0.52 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Temple: +0.01 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Charlotte: +0.26 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Memphis: -0.03 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs UTSA: +0.14 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Florida Atlantic: -0.04 EPA/play14
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@NC StateL17-244.88324.00180-0.13
2vsCampbellW56-37172.420.55
3@Coastal CarolinaW38-0-15.115593.9011200.14
4vsBYUL13-3415.96437.2012100.25
5vsArmyW28-60.815583.900.04
7@TulaneL19-266.39313.402500.14
8vsTulsaW41-27-10.0161257.8131000.52
10@TempleW45-14-5.114846.013400.01
11vsCharlotteW48-22-26.711857.7131300.26
12vsMemphisW31-277.6271033.82130-0.03
13@UTSAL24-583.711524.700.14
14@Florida AtlanticW42-3-8.717533.10-0.04

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
18.0%
Passing plays
3.9%
Rushing plays
30.3%
Standard downs
20.1%
Passing downs
12.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.12
Passing downs
0.17
Pass / Rush EPA
0.01 / 0.14

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.