Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Luke Altmyer

#9Luke Altmyer

Luke Altmyer is a Dual-Threat QB for Illinois. Luke's 2025 season ranks in the 10th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 380 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

45%
projected
band 27%'25 53%63%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing
246/365 Comp/Att3007 Pass yards22 Pass TD5 INT67.4% Comp %
Rushing
242 Rush yards5 Rush TD100 Carries2.4 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)10th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency79th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.29 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.90 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Purdue (SP+ -6).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Western Illinois: +0.68 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Duke: +0.61 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Western Michigan: +0.36 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Indiana: +0.00 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs USC: +0.89 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Purdue: +0.90 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Ohio State: +0.13 EPA/play7Wk 10 vs Rutgers: +0.56 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Maryland: +0.28 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Wisconsin: +0.19 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Northwestern: +0.22 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Tennessee: +0.15 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsWestern IllinoisW52-317/212173089.7-1600.68
2@DukeW45-196.622/312963085.9400.61
3vsWestern MichiganW38-0-1.417/261962051.1010.36
4@IndianaL10-6332.414/221461042.9-2700.00
5vsUSCW34-3216.920/263282097.52810.89
6@PurdueW43-27-6.119/223901090.9300.90
7vsOhio StateL16-3430.130/442481164.4-2000.13
9@WashingtonL25-4218.422/341992283.5480
10vsRutgersW35-131.019/312354188.98810.56
12vsMarylandW24-60.615/251722180.56200.28
13@WisconsinL10-27-4.421/352480066.02010.19
14vsNorthwesternW20-135.810/151360016.5-200.22
1vsTennesseeW30-2815.020/331961069.95410.15

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
53.3%
Passing plays
97.5%
Rushing plays
13.8%
Standard downs
45.3%
Passing downs
72.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.27
Passing downs
0.60
Pass / Rush EPA
0.40 / 0.43

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.