Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Malachi Hosley

#0Malachi Hosley

Malachi Hosley is a Explosive Back for Georgia Tech. Malachi's 2025 season ranks in the 3th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 105 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

14%
projected
band 7%'25 13%22%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
697 Rush yards7 Rush TD98 Carries7.1 Yards/carry
Receiving
14 Receptions119 Rec yards0 Rec TD8.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)3th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency29th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.34 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.08 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Temple (SP+ -5).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Colorado: +0.31 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Gardner-Webb: +0.21 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Clemson: -0.15 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Temple: +1.08 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Wake Forest: +0.02 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Virginia Tech: +0.74 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Duke: -0.25 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs NC State: +0.08 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Boston College: +0.42 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Pittsburgh: -0.38 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Georgia: -0.23 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs BYU: +0.25 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@ColoradoW27-20-8.37476.7012400.31
2vsGardner-WebbW59-12910011.120.21
3vsClemsonW24-219.53134.30210-0.15
4vsTempleW45-24-5.155911.821.08
5@Wake ForestW30-295.78364.502700.02
7vsVirginia TechW35-20-10.11112911.710.74
8@DukeW27-186.611232.11-0.25
9vsSyracuseW41-16-13.188110.10
10@NC StateL36-484.86305.0011600.08
12@Boston CollegeW36-34-8.5151077.1134700.42
13vsPittsburghL28-428.4133.003120-0.38
14vsGeorgiaL9-1624.1362.001-10-0.23
1vsBYUL21-2515.911635.7011300.25

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
13.4%
Passing plays
4.7%
Rushing plays
21.6%
Standard downs
13.8%
Passing downs
12.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.25
Passing downs
0.14
Pass / Rush EPA
0.35 / 0.20

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.