Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Malik Washington

#7Malik Washington

Malik Washington is a Dual-Threat QB for Maryland. Malik's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 488 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

50%
projected
band 32%'25 65%68%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing
273/473 Comp/Att2963 Pass yards17 Pass TD9 INT57.7% Comp %
Rushing
317 Rush yards4 Rush TD55 Carries5.8 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency62th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.26 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.85 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Towson.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.30 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Northern Illinois: +0.07 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Towson: +0.85 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Wisconsin: +0.28 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Washington: +0.20 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Nebraska: +0.25 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs UCLA: +0.11 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Indiana: -0.13 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Rutgers: -0.07 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Illinois: -0.04 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Michigan: +0.18 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Michigan State: +0.36 EPA/play14
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsFlorida AtlanticW39-7-8.727/432583048.50.30
2vsNorthern IllinoisW20-9-16.719/352542029.4-100.07
3vsTowsonW44-1716/222611194.82910.85
4@WisconsinW27-10-4.418/342652062.4-1210.28
6vsWashingtonL20-2418.430/492191159.0610.20
7vsNebraskaL31-346.227/372491074.72300.25
8@UCLAL17-20-8.723/482101149.66700.11
10vsIndianaL10-5532.416/312421238.810-0.13
11@RutgersL20-351.015/28981164.41641-0.07
12@IllinoisL6-2412.925/462380142.560-0.04
13vsMichiganL20-4512.419/392101171.31600.18
14vsMichigan StateL28-38-3.438/614593167.81800.36

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
65.0%
Passing plays
95.7%
Rushing plays
15.2%
Standard downs
55.3%
Passing downs
84.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.04
Passing downs
0.53
Pass / Rush EPA
0.21 / 0.40

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.