Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Marcel Reed

#10Marcel Reed

Marcel Reed is a Dual-Threat QB for Texas A&M. Marcel's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 447 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

43%
projected
band 25%'25 50%61%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing
234/377 Comp/Att3169 Pass yards25 Pass TD12 INT62.1% Comp %
Rushing
493 Rush yards6 Rush TD104 Carries4.7 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency77th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.27 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.66 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Arkansas (SP+ 5).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs UTSA: +0.45 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Utah State: +0.31 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Notre Dame: +0.51 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Auburn: +0.27 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Mississippi State: +0.37 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Florida: +0.53 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Arkansas: +0.66 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs LSU: +0.51 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Missouri: +0.06 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs South Carolina: +0.33 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Samford: -0.14 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Texas: -0.00 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Miami: +0.04 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsUTSAW42-243.722/342894079.73900.45
2vsUtah StateW44-22-3.119/282203066.06610.31
3@Notre DameW41-4024.417/373602175.33700.51
5vsAuburnW16-1011.615/222070135.1-2300.27
6vsMississippi StateW31-94.113/231802156.73010.37
7vsFloridaW34-173.516/262341180.33710.53
8@ArkansasW45-425.123/322803083.55510.66
9@LSUW49-2510.312/212022292.410820.51
11@MissouriW38-1714.420/292212090.12900.06
12vsSouth CarolinaW31-305.922/394393279.81300.33
13vsSamfordW48-010/151203065.040-0.14
14@TexasL17-2716.220/321800265.4710-0.00
1vsMiamiL3-1020.725/392370258.62700.04

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
49.8%
Passing plays
86.7%
Rushing plays
18.9%
Standard downs
45.1%
Passing downs
61.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.26
Passing downs
0.43
Pass / Rush EPA
0.34 / 0.42

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.