Mark Fletcher Jr. is a Explosive Back for Miami. Mark's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 200 plays — a developing rate for the RB.
2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays
Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.
2025 Production
Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers
Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.
- ▸Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
- ▸Peak game: 0.72 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Bethune-Cookman.
NIL Market Tier· 2025
On3 valuation ↗Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.
Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.
Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value
Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.
| Player | Team | Yr | Plays | WEPA/play | Line val | Total EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saquon Barkley | Penn State | 2016 | 288 | 0.340 | 3.9 | 97.9 |
| Dalvin Cook | Florida State | 2016 | 292 | 0.340 | 4.3 | 99.3 |
| Breece Hall | Iowa State | 2020 | 301 | 0.340 | 4.5 | 102.3 |
| Eno Benjamin | Arizona State | 2018 | 316 | 0.330 | 4.6 | 104.3 |
| Hassan Haskins | Michigan | 2021 | 280 | 0.380 | 4.8 | 106.4 |
Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.
Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Opp SP+ | Car | Rush Yds | Avg | Rush TD | Rec | Rec Yds | Rec TD | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vsNotre Dame | W27-24 | 24.4 | 15 | 66 | 4.4 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0.07 |
| 2 | vsBethune-Cookman | W45-3 | — | 11 | 86 | 7.8 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0.72 |
| 3 | vsSouth Florida | W49-12 | 11.6 | 16 | 120 | 7.5 | 2 | 2 | 25 | 0 | 0.50 |
| 4 | vsFlorida | W26-7 | 3.5 | 24 | 116 | 4.8 | 1 | — | — | — | 0.04 |
| 6 | @Florida State | W28-22 | 7.2 | 12 | 40 | 3.3 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0.00 |
| 8 | vsLouisville | L21-24 | 12.4 | 8 | 18 | 2.3 | 1 | — | — | — | 0.01 |
| 9 | vsStanford | W42-7 | -11.8 | 23 | 106 | 4.6 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 0 | — |
| 10 | @SMU | L20-26 | 13.4 | 16 | 84 | 5.3 | 0 | 3 | 19 | 0 | 0.02 |
| 13 | @Virginia Tech | W34-17 | -10.1 | 6 | 19 | 3.2 | 0 | 3 | 22 | 1 | 0.11 |
| 14 | @Pittsburgh | W38-7 | 8.4 | 10 | 30 | 3.0 | 1 | — | — | — | -0.21 |
| 1 | vsOle Miss | W31-27 | 24.0 | 22 | 133 | 6.0 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.36 |
| 1 | vsOhio State | W24-14 | 30.1 | 19 | 90 | 4.7 | 0 | 2 | 25 | 1 | 0.36 |
| 1 | vsIndiana | L21-27 | 32.4 | 17 | 112 | 6.6 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0.36 |
| 1 | @Texas A&M | W10-3 | 20.7 | 17 | 172 | 10.1 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.36 |
Usage & Situational · Pro
- Standard downs
- 0.20
- Passing downs
- -0.11
- Pass / Rush EPA
- 0.08 / 0.17
Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).