Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Miles Davis

Miles Davis

Miles Davis is a Explosive Back for Utah State. Miles's 2025 season ranks in the 8th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 139 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

17%
projected
band 9%'25 17%24%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
732 Rush yards8 Rush TD131 Carries5.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
28 Receptions201 Rec yards3 Rec TD7.2 Yards/rec
Returns
4 Kick returns68 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)8th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency55th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.30 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.67 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs McNeese.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State20162880.3403.997.9
Travis EtienneClemson20192130.4704.7100.1
Dalvin CookFlorida State20162920.3404.399.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs UTEP: +0.26 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Texas A&M: +0.63 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Air Force: +0.07 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs McNeese: +0.67 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Vanderbilt: -0.12 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Hawai'i: +0.37 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs San José State: +0.36 EPA/play8Wk 11 vs Nevada: +0.02 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs UNLV: +0.19 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Fresno State: -0.19 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Boise State: -0.24 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Washington State: +0.24 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsUTEPW28-16-17.512887.3166100.26
2@Texas A&ML22-4420.710505.003920.63
3vsAir ForceW49-30-3.29546.000.07
4vsMcNeeseW48-7131189.1153900.67
5@VanderbiltL35-5520.3640.702191-0.12
7@Hawai'iL26-441.7151026.8131200.37
8vsSan José StateW30-25-14.310505.000.36
9@New MexicoL14-330.91011011.01230
11vsNevadaW51-14-13.411333.020.02
12@UNLVL26-294.310424.2121400.19
13@Fresno StateW28-171.812383.20150-0.19
14vsBoise StateL24-253.18364.51140-0.24
1vsWashington StateL21-343.8571.4033500.24

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
17.4%
Passing plays
6.4%
Rushing plays
29.6%
Standard downs
20.6%
Passing downs
11.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.14
Passing downs
0.65
Pass / Rush EPA
0.81 / 0.10

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.