Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
NaQuari Rogers

#21NaQuari Rogers

RB·Utah·2025

NaQuari Rogers is a Explosive Back for Utah. NaQuari's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 79 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

13%
projected
band 6%'25 11%20%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
387 Rush yards11 Rush TD98 Carries3.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
3 Receptions43 Rec yards0 Rec TD14.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency30th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.41 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.04 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Cal Poly.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs UCLA: +0.14 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Cal Poly: +1.04 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Wyoming: +0.58 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Texas Tech: -0.01 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs West Virginia: +0.07 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Arizona State: +0.19 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs BYU: -0.14 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Cincinnati: +0.06 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Baylor: -0.17 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Kansas State: -0.02 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Nebraska: -0.12 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@UCLAW43-10-8.716613.811600.14
2vsCal PolyW63-97314.4213201.04
3@WyomingW31-6-11.313604.610.58
4vsTexas TechL10-3427.610373.70-0.01
5@West VirginiaW48-14-6.813614.701500.07
7vsArizona StateW42-103.912484.020.19
8@BYUL21-2415.9122.00-0.14
9vsColoradoW53-7-8.38253.11
10vsCincinnatiW45-144.58202.510.06
12@BaylorW55-281.46274.52-0.17
13vsKansas StateW51-477.0144.00-0.02
1vsNebraskaW44-226.23113.71-0.12

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
10.9%
Passing plays
1.2%
Rushing plays
18.0%
Standard downs
14.0%
Passing downs
1.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.16
Passing downs
0.70
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.18 / 0.20

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.