Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Nathan Stanley

Nathan Stanley

Nathan Stanley is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Iowa. Nathan's 2019 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 467 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2019 Production

Passing
237/399 Comp/Att2951 Pass yards16 Pass TD7 INT59.4% Comp %
Rushing
7 Rush yards1 Rush TD76 Carries0.1 Yards/carry
Punting
1 Punts34 Punt yards34.0 Yards/punt34 Long0 Inside 20

Performance Analysis · 2019 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency75th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.11 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.60 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Middle Tennessee (SP+ -11).

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Miami (OH): +0.45 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Rutgers: +0.33 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Iowa State: +0.31 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Middle Tennessee: +0.60 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Michigan: -0.11 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Penn State: +0.32 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Purdue: +0.32 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Northwestern: +0.18 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Wisconsin: +0.26 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Minnesota: +0.30 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Illinois: +0.27 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Nebraska: -0.26 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs USC: +0.49 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsMiami (OH)W38-14-9.221/302523082.82000.45
2vsRutgersW30-0-14.616/282363075.7900.33
3@Iowa StateW18-1712.622/352010068.51110.31
5vsMiddle TennesseeW48-3-11.317/252762085.5-100.60
6@MichiganL3-1020.723/422600323.1-650-0.11
7vsPenn StateL12-1724.325/432861160.9-500.32
8vsPurdueW26-20-0.723/332600163.2900.32
9@NorthwesternW20-0-5.512/261791061.1400.18
11@WisconsinL22-2420.317/2820820-300.26
12vsMinnesotaW23-1919.414/2317320100.30
13vsIllinoisW19-100.618/35308012200.27
14@NebraskaW27-242.611/249901140-0.26
1vsUSCW49-2413.118/2721320-900.49

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
53.1%
Passing plays
97.2%
Rushing plays
12.6%
Standard downs
45.8%
Passing downs
69.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.17
Passing downs
0.40
Pass / Rush EPA
0.23 / 0.49

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
2018
2017 — 2018 · 26 games
SeasonTeamLine valueWEPA/playYoY ΔTotal EPA
2017Iowa
7.8
0.510198.4
2018Iowa
7.3
0.510198.9

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.