Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Nico Iamaleava

#9Nico Iamaleava

QB·UCLA·2025

Nico Iamaleava is a Dual-Threat QB for UCLA. Nico's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 384 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

49%
projected
band 31%'25 62%67%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing
208/323 Comp/Att1928 Pass yards13 Pass TD7 INT64.4% Comp %
Rushing
505 Rush yards4 Rush TD112 Carries4.5 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency73th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.20 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.56 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Penn State (SP+ 18).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Utah: +0.12 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs UNLV: +0.41 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs New Mexico: +0.20 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Northwestern: +0.21 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Penn State: +0.56 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Michigan State: +0.28 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Maryland: +0.24 EPA/play8Wk 11 vs Nebraska: +0.31 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Washington: -0.22 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs USC: +0.08 EPA/play14
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsUtahL10-4322.211/221361150.44700.12
2@UNLVL23-304.329/412551175.15910.41
3vsNew MexicoL10-350.922/342171126.93300.20
5@NorthwesternL14-175.819/271801059.96500.21
6vsPenn StateW42-3718.117/241662096.712830.56
7@Michigan StateW38-13-3.416/241803053.6300.28
8vsMarylandW20-170.621/352211251.32500.24
9@IndianaL6-5632.413/271130218.4280
11vsNebraskaL21-286.217/251912089.18600.31
13vsWashingtonL14-4818.416/26690018.4160-0.22
14@USCL10-2916.927/382001059.41500.08

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
61.5%
Passing plays
95.4%
Rushing plays
26.0%
Standard downs
56.2%
Passing downs
73.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.12
Passing downs
0.42
Pass / Rush EPA
0.09 / 0.78

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.