#13Noah Kim
Noah Kim is a Dual-Threat QB for Eastern Michigan. Noah's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 406 plays — a developing rate for the QB.
2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays
Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.
2025 Production
Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers
A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.
- ▸Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
- ▸High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
- ▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
- ▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
- ▸Peak game: 0.44 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs Ball State (SP+ -23).
NIL Market Tier· 2025
On3 valuation ↗Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.
Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.
Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Opp SP+ | C/ATT | Pass Yds | Pass TD | INT | QBR | Rush Yds | Rush TD | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @Texas State | L27-52 | 2.3 | 23/34 | 248 | 1 | 0 | 51.9 | -14 | 0 | 0.42 |
| 2 | vsLong Island University | L23-28 | — | 18/29 | 189 | 2 | 0 | 42.8 | 38 | 0 | 0.24 |
| 3 | @Kentucky | L23-48 | 1.8 | 25/42 | 330 | 1 | 1 | 59.6 | 19 | 1 | 0.22 |
| 4 | vsLouisiana | W34-31 | -10.1 | 21/31 | 226 | 1 | 1 | 47.1 | 12 | 1 | 0.12 |
| 5 | @Central Michigan | L13-24 | -8.8 | 17/28 | 175 | 0 | 1 | 26.0 | 18 | 1 | 0.20 |
| 6 | @Buffalo | L30-31 | -7.5 | 19/31 | 168 | 2 | 0 | 49.3 | 10 | 1 | 0.14 |
| 7 | vsNorthern Illinois | W16-10 | -16.7 | 19/32 | 147 | 1 | 1 | 44.9 | 32 | 0 | 0.16 |
| 8 | @Miami (OH) | L30-44 | -3.4 | 20/36 | 309 | 4 | 2 | 36.8 | -2 | 0 | 0.31 |
| 9 | vsOhio | L21-28 | -4.0 | 21/30 | 259 | 2 | 0 | 57.1 | 30 | 1 | — |
| 11 | vsBowling Green | W27-21 | -12.6 | 22/39 | 210 | 1 | 0 | 51.9 | 28 | 0 | 0.16 |
| 12 | @Ball State | W24-9 | -23.0 | 18/29 | 229 | 1 | 2 | 43.4 | 21 | 1 | 0.44 |
| 14 | vsWestern Michigan | L21-31 | -1.4 | 24/41 | 327 | 2 | 3 | -1.0 | -6 | 0 | 0.18 |
Usage & Situational · Pro
- Standard downs
- 0.08
- Passing downs
- 0.43
- Pass / Rush EPA
- 0.25 / 0.21
Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).