Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Owen McCown

#13Owen McCown

QB·UTSA·2025

Owen McCown is a Dual-Threat QB for UTSA. Owen's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 393 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

42%
projected
band 24%'25 48%60%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing
276/409 Comp/Att2990 Pass yards30 Pass TD7 INT67.5% Comp %
Rushing
24 Rush yards1 Rush TD45 Carries0.5 Yards/carry
Punting
1 Punts40 Punt yards40.0 Yards/punt40 Long1 Inside 20

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency78th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.70 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs Tulane (SP+ 6).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Texas A&M: -0.08 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Texas State: +0.24 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Incarnate Word: +0.47 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Colorado State: +0.14 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Temple: +0.20 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Rice: +0.48 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs North Texas: +0.18 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Tulane: +0.70 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs South Florida: +0.17 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Charlotte: +0.15 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs East Carolina: +0.27 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Army: +0.10 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Florida International: +0.45 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@Texas A&ML24-4220.719/321210043.8-80-0.08
2vsTexas StateL36-432.323/432192047.75500.24
3vsIncarnate WordW48-2029/352384078.21000.47
4@Colorado StateW17-16-15.614/271731236.5300.14
6@TempleL21-27-5.125/372342240.8-1500.20
7vsRiceW61-13-14.815/212363087.8-1200.48
8@North TexasL17-5513.811/20841028.5-600.18
10vsTulaneW48-266.331/333704095.2000.70
11@South FloridaL23-5511.616/232001134.6-3900.17
12@CharlotteW28-7-26.724/373062140.4210.15
13vsEast CarolinaW58-248.024/332485094.71700.27
14vsArmyL24-270.827/402662143.0-500.10
1vsFlorida InternationalW57-20-10.518/282953054.02200.45

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
47.7%
Passing plays
88.9%
Rushing plays
5.3%
Standard downs
42.3%
Passing downs
59.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.20
Passing downs
0.41
Pass / Rush EPA
0.28 / 0.38

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.