Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Parker Navarro

#13Parker Navarro

Parker Navarro is a Dual-Threat QB for Ohio. Parker's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 403 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

43%
projected
band 25%'25 50%61%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing
188/303 Comp/Att2375 Pass yards14 Pass TD11 INT62.0% Comp %
Rushing
886 Rush yards9 Rush TD161 Carries5.5 Yards/carry
Punting
1 Punts34 Punt yards34.0 Yards/punt34 Long0 Inside 20

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency80th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.18 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.53 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Rutgers (SP+ 1).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Rutgers: +0.53 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs West Virginia: +0.15 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Ohio State: +0.21 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Gardner-Webb: +0.49 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Bowling Green: +0.30 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Ball State: +0.37 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Northern Illinois: +0.32 EPA/play8Wk 11 vs Miami (OH): +0.34 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Western Michigan: -0.01 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Massachusetts: -0.13 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Buffalo: +0.31 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs UNLV: +0.27 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@RutgersL31-341.021/312393093.89310.53
2vsWest VirginiaW17-10-6.822/312471348.38700.15
3@Ohio StateL9-3730.16/13941054.8300.21
4vsGardner-WebbW52-3518/272901070.77200.49
5vsBowling GreenW35-20-12.617/252082174.36620.30
6@Ball StateL14-20-23.016/291881034.97700.37
8vsNorthern IllinoisW48-21-16.717/232050186.04310.32
9@Eastern MichiganW28-21-14.723/283152250.9630
11vsMiami (OH)W24-20-3.416/312011148.63200.34
12@Western MichiganL13-17-1.48/19700133.11051-0.01
13vsMassachusettsW42-14-36.63/8280021.4812-0.13
14@BuffaloW31-26-7.510/231472178.112110.31
1vsUNLVW17-104.311/151430155.44310.27

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
50.1%
Passing plays
96.7%
Rushing plays
22.9%
Standard downs
44.4%
Passing downs
64.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.21
Passing downs
0.42
Pass / Rush EPA
0.24 / 0.47

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
2024 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.