Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Robert Henry

Robert Henry

RB·UTSA·2025

Robert Henry is a Explosive Back for UTSA. Robert's 2025 season ranks in the 8th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 167 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

20%
projected
band 13%'25 24%28%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
1045 Rush yards9 Rush TD151 Carries6.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
18 Receptions114 Rec yards2 Rec TD6.3 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns0 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)8th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency47th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.53 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.66 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Texas A&M (SP+ 21).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State20162880.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State20162920.3404.399.3
Travis EtienneClemson20192130.4704.7100.1
Breece HallIowa State20203010.3404.5102.3
James FlandersTulsa20162660.3904.9103.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Texas A&M: +0.66 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Texas State: +0.58 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Incarnate Word: +0.47 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Colorado State: +0.44 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Temple: +0.00 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Rice: +0.29 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs North Texas: +0.00 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Tulane: -0.14 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs South Florida: -0.10 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Charlotte: -0.31 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Army: +0.04 EPA/play14
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@Texas A&ML24-4220.71617711.123-900.66
2vsTexas StateL36-432.3171599.4242110.58
3vsIncarnate WordW48-201414410.322800.47
4@Colorado StateW17-16-15.6211446.9127610.44
6@TempleL21-27-5.112423.503900.00
7vsRiceW61-13-14.812645.310.29
8@North TexasL17-5513.81213811.510.00
10vsTulaneW48-266.316875.40140-0.14
11@South FloridaL23-5511.610272.70230-0.10
12@CharlotteW28-7-26.7810.10-0.31
14vsArmyL24-270.813624.801200.04

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
24.0%
Passing plays
6.4%
Rushing plays
44.1%
Standard downs
23.8%
Passing downs
24.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.11
Passing downs
0.53
Pass / Rush EPA
0.34 / 0.23

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.