Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Scottre Humphrey

#22Scottre Humphrey

Scottre Humphrey is a Explosive Back for New Mexico. Scottre's 2025 season ranks in the 15th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 78 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

14%
projected
band 7%'25 14%22%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
349 Rush yards5 Rush TD77 Carries4.5 Yards/carry
Receiving
3 Receptions22 Rec yards1 Rec TD7.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)15th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency23th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.31 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.66 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs UCLA (SP+ -9).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Michigan: -0.23 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Idaho State: +0.34 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs UCLA: +0.66 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs New Mexico State: +0.14 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs San José State: +0.51 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Boise State: +0.14 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Nevada: +0.50 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs UNLV: -0.24 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Colorado State: -0.51 EPA/play12
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@MichiganL17-3412.410333.30180-0.23
2vsIdaho StateW32-22181417.820.34
3@UCLAW35-10-8.76488.010.66
5vsNew Mexico StateW38-20-15.513413.201810.14
6@San José StateL28-35-14.36101.710.51
7@Boise StateL25-413.1382.701600.14
8vsNevadaW24-22-13.413584.510.50
9vsUtah StateW33-14-3.1571.40
10@UNLVW40-354.3111.00-0.24
12vsColorado StateW20-17-15.6221.00-0.51

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
13.7%
Passing plays
2.1%
Rushing plays
24.8%
Standard downs
15.6%
Passing downs
9.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.32
Passing downs
-0.06
Pass / Rush EPA
0.43 / 0.23

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.