Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Sieh Bangura

#5Sieh Bangura

RB·Ohio·2025

Sieh Bangura is a Featured Back for Ohio. Sieh's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 228 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

23%
projected
band 16%'25 29%30%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
1392 Rush yards15 Rush TD240 Carries5.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
13 Receptions77 Rec yards0 Rec TD5.9 Yards/rec
Returns
3 Kick returns141 KR yards1 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency27th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.18 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.51 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Northern Illinois (SP+ -17).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State20162880.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State20162920.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State20203010.3404.5102.3
Donnel PumphreySan Diego State20163440.3204.2110.1
Eno BenjaminArizona State20183160.3304.6104.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Rutgers: -0.03 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs West Virginia: -0.01 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Ohio State: -0.41 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Gardner-Webb: +0.45 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Bowling Green: +0.22 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Ball State: -0.28 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Northern Illinois: +0.51 EPA/play8Wk 11 vs Miami (OH): +0.06 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Western Michigan: +0.34 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Massachusetts: +0.22 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Buffalo: +0.06 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs UNLV: +0.19 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@RutgersL31-341.016865.40150-0.03
2vsWest VirginiaW17-10-6.820663.313160-0.01
3@Ohio StateL9-3730.112242.00-0.41
4vsGardner-WebbW52-35181236.831500.45
5vsBowling GreenW35-20-12.6181156.400.22
6@Ball StateL14-20-23.015674.50150-0.28
8vsNorthern IllinoisW48-21-16.7221476.730.51
9@Eastern MichiganW28-21-14.7181005.621120
11vsMiami (OH)W24-20-3.4171026.0133000.06
12@Western MichiganL13-17-1.416976.111000.34
13vsMassachusettsW42-14-36.6271967.321-200.22
14@BuffaloW31-26-7.5221205.511600.06
1vsUNLVW17-104.3191497.810.19

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
28.8%
Passing plays
4.7%
Rushing plays
44.1%
Standard downs
31.8%
Passing downs
21.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.08
Passing downs
0.33
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.23 / 0.16

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.