Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Sutton Smith

#5Sutton Smith

Sutton Smith is a Committee Back for Memphis. Sutton's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 109 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

15%
projected
band 8%'25 15%23%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
669 Rush yards7 Rush TD102 Carries6.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
20 Receptions109 Rec yards0 Rec TD5.5 Yards/rec
Returns
5 Kick returns155 KR yards1 KR TD15 Punt returns125 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.34 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.94 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Arkansas (SP+ 5).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Chattanooga: +0.06 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Georgia State: +0.29 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Troy: +0.08 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Arkansas: +0.94 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Florida Atlantic: -0.28 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Tulsa: +0.04 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs UAB: +0.48 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Rice: -1.43 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Tulane: +0.30 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs East Carolina: -0.14 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Navy: +0.01 EPA/play14
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsChattanoogaW45-109606.711200.06
2@Georgia StateW38-16-24.514745.3144300.29
3@TroyW28-7-4.8181136.322700.08
4vsArkansasW32-315.11214712.310.94
5@Florida AtlanticW55-26-8.77263.70100-0.28
6vsTulsaW45-7-10.010343.411600.04
8@UABL24-31-15.85265.201500.48
9vsSouth FloridaW34-3111.610353.50150
10@RiceW38-14-14.8200.002110-1.43
11vsTulaneL32-386.322010.0021200.30
12@East CarolinaL27-318.0710915.61260-0.14
14vsNavyL17-286.26254.2031200.01

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
15.2%
Passing plays
5.3%
Rushing plays
25.1%
Standard downs
18.4%
Passing downs
8.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.16
Passing downs
0.09
Pass / Rush EPA
0.06 / 0.17

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.