Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Taylen Green

#10Taylen Green

Line value
6.1 pts
NFL Draft OutlookDay 3 (Rds 4–7)· model estimate based on position rank

Taylen Green is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Arkansas. Taylen's 2024 season ranks in the 10th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 518 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2024 Production

Passing
230/381 Comp/Att3153 Pass yards15 Pass TD9 INT60.4% Comp %
Rushing
602 Rush yards8 Rush TD156 Carries3.9 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)10th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency75th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.15 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.01 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Mississippi State (SP+ -4).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jordan TravisFlorida State20216900.47610.1328.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff: +0.78 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Oklahoma State: +0.28 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs UAB: +0.16 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Auburn: +0.20 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Texas A&M: +0.19 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Tennessee: +0.22 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs LSU: +0.29 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Mississippi State: +1.01 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Ole Miss: +0.47 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Texas: -0.17 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.42 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Missouri: +0.20 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Texas Tech: +0.78 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsArkansas-Pine BluffW70-016/232292091.58820.78
2@Oklahoma StateL31-39-2.626/454161158.16100.28
3vsUABW37-27-11.311/261610150.89620.16
4@AuburnW24-149.512/271511280.38000.20
5vsTexas A&ML17-2117.023/412791159.0600.19
6vsTennesseeW19-1422.019/272660079.7-500.22
8vsLSUL10-3415.921/312391151.0-1000.29
9@Mississippi StateW58-25-4.123/293145190.47911.01
10vsOle MissL31-6327.910/141580040.91600.47
12vsTexasL10-2024.117/251490150.6-40-0.17
13vsLouisiana TechW35-14-11.620/372212187.86120.42
14@MissouriL21-2814.021/352290075.15300.20
1vsTexas TechW39-264.311/213412095.98110.78

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
58.7%
Passing plays
91.8%
Rushing plays
27.2%
Standard downs
51.3%
Passing downs
74.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.17
Passing downs
0.56
Pass / Rush EPA
0.33 / 0.33

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
2024
2022 — 2024 · 24 games
SeasonTeamLine valueWEPA/playYoY ΔTotal EPA
2022Boise State
7.9
0.570207.9
2024Arkansas
6.1
0.410-0.16215.4

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.